Can the US and China keep competition under control?
November 16, 2021
Although the virtual meeting between the US and Chinese leaders did not lead to any big breakthroughs, both sides expressed willingness to cooperate on "guardrails" to prevent competition from turning into catastrophe.
US President Joe Biden and Chinese leader Xi Jinping met for a three-hour virtual summit Monday. The talks failed to produce any major breakthroughs, but nevertheless provided a welcome sign that both leaders are working toward managing strained US-China relations with more transparency and stability.
Monday's summit was the first formal meeting between Biden and Xi since the US president took office in January.
According to official accounts of the talks, Biden raised US concerns about human rights abuses and unfair trade practices. Xi warned the US on Taiwan, saying Washington's support for Taipei was "playing with fire."
Despite the friction on big bilateral issues, opening statements from the summit indicated that Washington and Beijing could be moving toward what foreign policy analysts call "managed strategic competition" in pursuing goals.
Biden: Leaders must ensure US, China do not 'veer into conflict'
The framework, conceived by China expert and former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, envisions intense diplomatic and economic competition, defined areas of collaboration such as on climate change, and "hard limits" on each country's security policies to avoid "accidental escalation."
"Our responsibility as leaders of China and the United States is to ensure that the competition between our countries does not veer into conflict, whether intended or unintended. Just simple, straightforward competition," Biden said in opening remarks surrounded by aides in the White House's Roosevelt Room.
"We need to establish some commonsense guardrails, to be clear and honest where we disagree, and work together where our interests intersect," Biden said.
In opening statements made through an interpreter, Xi said that China and the US "need to increase communication and cooperation."
"China and the United States should respect each other, coexist in peace and pursue win-win cooperation," Xi said.
Is China really open to compromise?
"A sound and steady China-US relationship is required for advancing our two countries' respective development and for safeguarding a peaceful and stable international environment," Xi said, adding that he was "ready to work" with Biden on "building consensus," and moving China-US relations "forward in a positive direction. "
"The purpose of a summit-level meeting like this is a confidence-building measure aimed at putting on guardrails to make sure that, as both sides compete, it will not escalate into a catastrophe," Wen-Ti Sung, a China scholar at the Australian National University, told DW.
According to Chinese state media, Xi has blamed current tension on "attempts by the Taiwan authorities to look for US support for their independence agenda, as well as the intention of some Americans to use Taiwan to contain China."
The White House said Biden told Xi during their discussion that the US would stand by the "One China" policy, allowing for informal relations and defense ties between Taipei and Washington, but not for official recognition by the US of Taiwan as an independent state.
The White House added that Biden affirmed that the US "strongly opposes unilateral efforts to change the status quo or undermine peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait."
"I think Taiwan should take the outcome of this summit with cautious optimism," Sung said. "If we get one message out of the summit, then that is: Competition will be the main theme governing US-China relations," he added. He said any sign that Washington and Beijing might occasionally be cooperating in the future wouldn't necessarily indicate that the US is abandoning its support for Taipei.
"Whenever we see signs of competition between the US and China, it doesn't mean there is only a one-way street towards conflict and war. And when we see signs of cooperation, it also doesn't mean that the US is capitulating to China," Sung said.
"Taiwan should focus on ensuring that it remains indispensable and it remains a responsible and considerate partner to liberal democracies around the world. But do so in a way that doesn't obviously cross China's red line," he added.
Where do US-China relations go from here?
Dexter Roberts, senior fellow at the Asia Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council in Washington, told DW that Monday's summit may have jump-started dialogue, but substantive agreements between the US and China remain unlikely.
On the economic front, Roberts said issues included China's mercantilist industrial policies, which create unfair economic advantages for Chinese companies, and the US's responding with policies that "aim at basically destroying some of what China perceives as its economic and business national champions like Huawei."
"I think they could definitely ease tensions and make incremental progress on things like intellectual property rights that the US has been worried about. But, longer term, I'm afraid there are some insurmountable obstacles on trade," Roberts said. "I think those issues aren't going to go away."
Both experts said lower-level meetings between Chinese ministries and their counterparts would likely follow the summit.
"The fact that top-level leaders on both sides can directly communicate in a relatively cordial atmosphere will have the effect of normalizing and legitimizing regular interactions and negotiations between working level officials down the food chain," Sung said.
"In that sense, it will contribute to a somewhat improved atmosphere, but, in terms of substantive agreements, we are still a long way off," he added.
"Both sides are still at the bargaining stage over what political foundation a working relationship can be built upon," Sung said.