German doctor sues for right to be removed from review website Jameda | News | DW | 23.01.2018

Visit the new DW website

Take a look at the beta version of We're not done yet! Your opinion can help us make it better.

  1. Inhalt
  2. Navigation
  3. Weitere Inhalte
  4. Metanavigation
  5. Suche
  6. Choose from 30 Languages


German doctor sues for right to be removed from review website Jameda

A dermatologist is suing a website that promises neutral reviews of doctors, claiming it is simply advertising. Online portal Jameda has been sued by dozens of physicians over claims of dubious practices.

Germany's highest criminal court was set to rule on Tuesday over whether a doctor has the right to remove herself from the popular rating platform Jameda. This is far from the first time the portal has faced legal trouble for its practices.

Jameda is the country's most comprehensive list of doctor recommendations — where 280,000 physicians are given ratings by patients based on a system akin to school grades in Germany, where 1.0 is the highest possible mark.

The plaintiff in Tuesday's case at the Federal Court of Justice is a dermatologist from Cologne who says she has the right to demand Jameda remove her name from the site due to "personal injury," as the anonymous nature of the site can inspire users to leave vitriolic, hyperbolic posts.

Read more: German doctor lodges petition to change abortion law

Dozens of doctors have brought suits against Jameda in recent years, claiming the site is easily manipulated and has an undue influence on their livelihoods.

However, when a gynecologist asked to be removed from the site in 2014, the Federal Court of Justice ruled that the right of patients to be well informed about their choice in doctor took precedence over a doctor's right to self-determination on the internet.

Watch video 03:03

How much should you pay for your life?

Defense: Jameda is an advertising site

Tuesday's case has taken on a broader scope — lawyers for the dermatologist have argued that Jameda is a source of disinformation, misrepresenting certain aspects of its platform to its users.

It turns out doctors can pay to have "silver, gold or platinum" Jameda memberships. According to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily, many users have claimed that their negative reviews of doctors with paid memberships never appear online.

Read more: German court increases pressure on comparison sites

Last year, the high court ruled that Jameda had to make its policies regarding premium members more transparent to its users, such as the practice of moving doctors who pay them to the top of the search results, and in some cases hiding their competition from view.

In that way, the dermatologist says, Jameda is not an equal-opportunity review platform, but an advertising scheme for doctors.

A spokeswoman for Jameda defended the site's practices, saying its review procedure is "absolutely neutral."

DW recommends