Bundeswehr weaponry and training ′inadequate′, say officials | Germany | News and in-depth reporting from Berlin and beyond | DW | 07.04.2010

Visit the new DW website

Take a look at the beta version of dw.com. We're not done yet! Your opinion can help us make it better.

  1. Inhalt
  2. Navigation
  3. Weitere Inhalte
  4. Metanavigation
  5. Suche
  6. Choose from 30 Languages
Advertisement

Germany

Bundeswehr weaponry and training 'inadequate', say officials

Military officials deem Bundeswehr ammunition, tanks and helicopters "inadequate" for missions in Afghanistan. This comes after a leading defense expert criticized the way Bundeswehr soldiers are being trained.

German soldiers in northern Afghanistan

For Germany, the danger in Afghanistan is growing

A number of German military officials have been quoted as criticizing the equipment - ranging from ammunition to tanks and helicopters - used by troops in Afghanistan as inadequate for their mission in the war-torn country.

Brigadier General Joerg Vollmer, who served as the regional commander in the north of Afghanistan until the fall of last year, said in an internal military report that the ammunition used by German soldiers in Kunduz was "unsuitable," adding that tank shells "lacked the ability to penetrate walls and other structures."

A Bundeswehr soldier stationed in Afghanistan

'The Taliban would think twice looking down the barrel of a Leopard 2'

Also in that report, the former commander of the Bundeswehr mission in Kosovo, Klaus Reinhardt, described German helicopters as "ancient birds that have been in use for over a half century."

The newly designated parliamentary commissioner for the armed forces, Hellmut Koenigshaus, argued for the use of more powerful tanks, for instance the Leopard 2 main battle tank.

"Taliban militants would think twice if they see one of these tanks coming," Koenigshaus told the German daily Tagesspiegel.

Insufficient training

Not all criticism has centered on Bundeswehr weaponry, however. Germany's outgoing parliamentary commissioner for the armed forces, Reinhold Robbe, criticized the way German soldiers are trained before being sent to Afghanistan, in particular with regard to the use of tanks and other armored vehicles.

Germany's parliamentary commissioner for the armed forces, Reinhold Robbe

Robbe, right, says more must be done for soldiers

"Our soldiers need thorough training with these vehicles - before they are sent to Afghanistan to use them in combat situations. They must be confident enough that they can operate them in their sleep," Robbe said.

This comes in response to an attack last Friday against a German patrol in northern Afghanistan, which saw Taliban militants kill three German soldiers and wound eight others.

The attack in Kunduz began when the German patrol was on a mine-clearing mission, using the exact vehicles that Robbe said soldiers were ill-prepared to use.

Always room for improvement

However, Heinz Schulte, editor-in-chief of the Griephan Global Security Magazine, said the recent wave of criticism of German military practices should be kept in context. He called it "no new practice" for armies to complain about their equipment and training.

Bundeswehr soldiers lined up behind an armored vehicle

Schulte agrees: More training is needed with armored vehicles

"It is a general rule that armies complain about not having the right equipment or that they haven't got enough training. So I think this is not germane to the German situation. I think it's a general problem, because normally armies have the equipment that was optimized for the last war," Schulte told Deutsche Welle.

Schulte said the important thing to take from the current political debate were suggestions that can enhance the safety of German troops in Afghanistan. He insisted that there were always ways to improve the state of the military, especially with regard to the training of soldiers.

"Germany puts a tremendous amount of effort towards supplying its troops with state-of-the-art protection, but there is always room for improvement. And, if there are valid criticisms, then they have to be taken on board."

Author: Gabriel Borrud
Editor: Chuck Penfold

DW recommends

Audios and videos on the topic