1. Skip to content
  2. Skip to main menu
  3. Skip to more DW sites

Top Norway court hears 'stop oil drilling' case

November 4, 2020

Norway’s top court has begun hearing a key Greens' appeal against more oil drilling in the Arctic. The appellants argue further climate warming will result, violating constitutional rights to a healthy environment.

Drilling in the Norwegian Arctic
Image: Greenpeace Norway

The appeal led by Greenpeace Norway and local group Nature and Youth before Norway's Supreme Court, the Bokmal, is expected to run seven days, into next week. A ruling is not expected until December or January.

For the government, Attorney General Fredrik Sejersted said the Barents See drilling licenses — granted despite Norway backing the UN's 2015 climate treaty — complied with "thorough professional, administrative, and political processes."

Greenpeace Norway head Frode Pleym said the appeal case was to persuade the Bokmal that Norway's 2014 constitution, prescribing a healthy environment in article 112, would be breached if drilling prevailed.

The appellants, also including Friends of the Earth Norway and Grandparents Climate Campaign, also cite the risk of "uncontrolled oil spills” and "inadequate” socio-economic assessment of what CO2 emissions will actually cost.  

Previously, two lower courts had declared the awarding of the exploration licences to 13 oil companies in 2016, including Norway's energy giant Equinor, as legal.

At the previous second hearing, Norway's Appeals Court did, however, rule that CO2 emissions ought to encompass oil exports burned outside Norway.

Norway is ranked by the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA) as "one of the world's largest energy exporters” but also as an advocate of "sustainability.”

Rising temperatures

Read more: What impact is hate speech having on climate activism around the world?

‘Violates' Paris climate agreement 

Pleym said Norway would not be able to meet its 2015 pledges to slash its carbon dioxide emissions if it continued to allow oil and gas drilling.

"Not acting now violates the Paris Agreement and Norway's own constitution, that is why we are back in court," said Pleym. "Climate change knows no borders."

'Cancel,' says Greenpeace International

Backing appellants, who hope the case will set a constitutional trend worldwide, Greenpeace International said Norway needed to "cancel all drilling for new oil in the Arctic."

"The Norwegian government can no longer ignore the dangerous impact its exported oil is having on the climate," it said.

Visiting Norway in 2019, the UN's human rights and environment rapporteur David R. Boyd said having a "healthy and sustainable environment" was upheld in 100 national constitutions in all regions of the world.

Read more: EU fails to introduce agricultural reform 

Paradoxical disinvestment

Since it began offshore drilling in 1969, Norway's major oil and gas exports have bolstered its sizeable Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund.

Paradoxically the fund has divested from many oil and gas stocks, reputedly to avoid price fluctuations. And, yields in the Barents Sea are reportedly disappointing.

Withdrawal from Paris Agreement puts US 'at a disadvantage'

ipj/rc (dpa, Reuters, AFP)