Faster-than-light finding called into question | Science| In-depth reporting on science and technology | DW | 24.02.2012
  1. Inhalt
  2. Navigation
  3. Weitere Inhalte
  4. Metanavigation
  5. Suche
  6. Choose from 30 Languages


Faster-than-light finding called into question

European scientists say that new problems have cropped up in results from a controversial neutrino experiment. For now, Einstein's theory of relativity appears to be safe.

** FILE ** A May 31, 2007 file photo shows a view of the LHC (large hadron collider) in its tunnel at CERN (European particle physics laboratory) near Geneva, Switzerland. One huge scientific experiment being launched Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2008 is described as an Alice in Wonderland investigation into the makeup of the universe, or dangerous tampering with Nature that could spell Doomsday for the Earth. The first beams of protons will be fired around the 27-kilometer (17-mile) tunnel at the launch Wednesday to test the controlling strength of the world's largest superconducting magnets. It will still be several weeks before beams traveling in opposite directions are brought together in collisions that some skeptics fear could create micro black holes they theorize could endanger the planet. (AP Photo/Keystone, Martial Trezzini, File)

CERN fired neutrinos from Switzerland to Italy

The team of European physicists that initially claimed to have measured a faster-than-light particle in September 2011, and later confirmed that result in November, may not have been correct.

In a statement published Thursday on its website, scientists from CERN, the European nuclear physics research center outside of Geneva, Switzerland, wrote that there may have been some errors in its experiment, which involved firing sets of neutrinos from CERN to a detector in Italy.

Those experiments apparently resulted in a speed of 300,006 kilometers per second, which is just above the established speed of light, usually measured at 299,792 kilometers per second. Einstein's special theory of relativity says nothing can travel faster than light.

Scientists from the Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tracking Apparatus (OPERA), based in Gran Sasso, Italy, the partner laboratory with CERN in the experiment, wrote Thursday that there may have been some mis-synchronized GPS devices that may have provided inaccuracies about the precise time, which "could have led to an overestimate of the neutrino's time of flight."

The group added that there was another issue, concerning "the optical fibre connector that brings the external GPS signal to the OPERA master clock, which may not have been functioning correctly when the measurements were taken. If this is the case, it could have led to an underestimate of the time of flight of the neutrinos."

But Dario Autiero, a physicist and spokesman for the OPERA experiment told The New York Times that it remained unclear if the original findings were incorrect, or if they continued to stand.

“We are not sure of the state of this connection in the past,” he said.

The OPERA group says it has scheduled new measurements for later this spring, and that plans for duplicating the experiment with a similar facillity in Japan are also underway.

Dr. Albert Einstein writes out an equation for the density of the Milky Way on the blackboard at the Carnegie Institute, Mt. Wilson Observatory headquarters in Pasadena, Calif., on Jan. 14, 1931. Einstein achieved world reknown in 1905, at age 26, when he expounded his Special Theory of Relativity which proposed the existence of atomic energy. Though his concepts ushered in the atomic age, he was a pacifist who warned against the arms race. Einstein, who radically changed mankind's vision of the universe, was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921. (AP Photo)

For now, it appears that Albert Einstein's theory of relativity is safe

Extraordinary claims

As of November, many OPERA team members who initially declined to sign their names to the paper have now come on board. That includes Caren Hagner, a professor of physics at the University of Hamburg, who had been one of the most skeptical members of the group.

"There can be an error in the measure of distance, or the measurement of time, or - because we use statistical methods to disentangle, to measure the time of flight of the neutrinos - it could also result in some nasty statistical effects," she told DW in September.

After the new experiment improved precision and augmented the statistical analysis, Hagner told the journal Nature that she has "much more confidence" in the updated November results.

But many cautious scientists often cite Carl Sagan, a giant among 20th century astrophysicists, who once said: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

Author: Cyrus Farivar
Editor: Stuart Tiffen

DW recommends